 |
|
|
The
Posner Law Firm
Privacy
and Surveillance Law for
Attorneys,
Businesses, Government, Charities, Trade Organizations,
Public Interest Groups and People
|
|
|
|
Practice
Area: Trade
Secret and Copyright Litigation
|
|
|
Intellectual
property law is unique in its constant tension between
the law's historic respect for precedent and the
need to deal with radical technologies that blur
traditional boundaries. Moreover, since technology
percolates almost uncontrollably through international
boundaries, it is not enough to understand the law
of one country. International law in the form of
treaties and other agreements, and the laws of individual
trading partners, misappropriating nations, and
even (as in the USA) the laws of sovereign states.
Preemption of state law by federal law is often
an issue. Intellectual property is important in
many areas of law -- including ones you might not
expect. For example, trade secrets are protected
in federal agriculture laws. Patents show up as
assets subject to securities and probate litigation.
Nor is the terminology always clear. Land patents
are a wholly different animal from intellectual
property patents.
Generally,
four legal traditions are considered to fall under
the umbrella of intellectual property law.
| Patent
Law: |
Description |
Protects
a new and useful process, machine, manufacture,
composition of matter, and improvements thereof.
Specifically excludes ideas, laws of nature,
scientific truths or principles and printed
matter. Although patent law traditionally protects
technology, in recent years business method
patents have been issued, expanding the patent
law's traditionall coverage. To file a patent,
an attorney must be a member of the patent bar,
registered with the federal Patent and Trademark
Office. At KBT, we are not patent attorneys.
However, we have been involved with patent litigation,
which does not require admission to the patent
bar. |
| a |
International
Treaties
|
Paris
Convention, Patent Coopertion Treaty, European
Patent Convention |
| a |
Federal
Law |
The
Patent Act is found in 35 USC 101 et seq. |
| a |
Colorado
Law |
Patents
are mentioned in Titles 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13,
15, 22, 23, 24, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
39 CRS. |
| Copyright
Law: |
Description |
Protects
works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium
of expression. Ideas and facts are not protected.
Computer software traditionally has been considered
a work protectible by copyright law. In recent
years, software patents also have been issued
(an example of the blurring of traditional boundaries.) |
| a |
International
Treaties |
Berne
Convention, Universal Copyright Convention |
| a |
Federal
Law |
U.S.
Copyright Law is codified in 17 USC 101 et seq. |
| a |
Colorado
Law |
Copyrights
are mentioned in Titles 4, 6, 7, 13, 15, 18,
22, 24, 39 CRS. Copyrights are particularly
protected by Art. 6-13 CRS. |
| Trademark
Law: |
Description |
Trademark
law actually protects three distinct entities:
| A
trademark is any word, name, symbol,
or device or any combination thereof adopted
and used by a manufacturer or merchant
to identify and distinguish his goods,
including a unique product, from those
manufactured or sold by others and to
indicate the sources of the goods, even
if that source is unknown. |
| A
service mark means a mark used
in the sale or advertising of services
to identify and distinguish the services
of one person, including a unique service,
from the services of others and to indicate
the source of the services, even if that
source is unknown. |
| A
tradename is a name used to identify
a business entity. Although a business
entity's name is not, in itself, protectible,
it may be protectible as a trademark if
it also identifies and distinguishes goods
and/or services. |
As
a practical matter, a trademark can consist
of: text, a slogan, a number, a design, stylized
text, stylized text and design, a product
shape, and possibly a product color. It must
be different enough from previously existing
marks so as not to deceive or cause confusion
or mistake. It can be suggestive, descriptive,
arbitrary or fanciful -- but it may not be
generic (e.g., the simple word "hardware"
cannot be made a trademark). A "common
law" trademark can be created by first
usage, but it is protected only in the geographical
area of usage.
|
| a |
International
Treaties |
Madrid
Agreement |
| a |
Federal
Law |
U.S.
Trademark Law is codified in Title 15 of the
United States Code |
| a |
Colorado
Law |
Trademarks
are mentioneded in Titles 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12,
13, 18, 22, 23, 24, 25, 32, 35, 39 & 42
CRS. They are the particular focus of Art. 7-70
thru 7-73 CRS. |
| Trade
Secret Law: |
Description |
Trade
secrecy protection depends not on public registration
or use, but its opposite -- reasonable efforts
to keep an intellectual asset secret. Disclosure
without protections invalidates trade secrecy
protection. For a disclosure not to invalidate
protections, the party receiving the disclosure
must be made aware that the information is confidential
and that the disclosure is subject to nondisclosure
and nonuse requirements, or to a fiduciary obligation.
To qualify a a trade secret, information must
be valuable in the sense of providing a competitive
advantage. Examples of trade secrets include
technologies, concepts, software, documentation,
designs or models, specifications, data, business
plan, techniques, certain customer lists, bidding
policies and procedures, certain marketing information.
|
| a |
International
Law |
No
treaties protect trade secrets. |
| a |
Federal
Law |
Trade
secret protection is found throughout the U.S.
Code and is mentioned in 346 statutory provisions
or in the case law interpreting those provisions. |
| a |
Colorado
Law |
Trade
secrets are mentioned in Titles 6, 7, 8, 10,
13, 16, 18, 23, 24, 25, 34, 35, 39 & 40
CRS. Trade secrecy is particularly protected
in Art. 7-74 CRS. |
|
|
| E-mail
us! |
Evergreen
Phone/Fax: 303-679-9841 |
P.O.
Box 495, Evergreen, CO 80437
|
|
Copyright
2001-2006 Steve C. Posner
|
|
TThe
purpose of this website is to advertise the firm and
offer information as a public service. Steve C. Posner
is admitted to practice in Colorado, New York and California,
he has not practiced in California (inactive status).
The firm does not endorse, take responsibility for,
or control any information on sites to which links are
provided. Nothing in this website is intended as legal
advice. You are strongly advised to seek legal counsel
regarding any issues you may face.
|
|
|